Mr. Hashimoto discussed about government which don’t have a leadership. Indeed, in Japan today, the opposition parties such as the Democratic Party and the Communist Party seems to have little ability to change Japan, rather it is declining it. Among them, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party has made fiscal reforms to improve the economy, and has also produced results in diplomacy and other aspects. But as he says, the LDP is in a crisis due to some scandalous problems of party members. This is said to be the responsibility of the prime minister who is the party leader of the LDP, but I think that it is not only that. Even any competent person will not know whether to succeed when you are in that position until inauguration. In addition everyone in the position of ruling party executives has no failure and it is nearly impossible as far as human beings can accomplish to the end. The opposition party eats up to take the deep-fried legs for the LDP’s mistakes and thoroughly criticizes it.
The original opposition party's role is to check the policies of the ruling party and challenge it. However, since the current opposition party only thinks of pulling out the ruling party from the regime, it loses sight of its original role as an opposition party, and the contents of the party are gone. Therefore, I think that the opposition party should take the ruling party's scandalous deep-fried legs and decide to drop the ruling party from the administration, but point out the essential policy part and think about how to make that policy better. In addition, He said tax rate should be adjusted to stabilize the economy. Current Japanese economy has a large amount of government bonds, therefore it is necessary to enrich public works and social security, etc. while reducing this government bond. It seems easy to raise taxes as he says because these expenditures are almost financed with taxes. However, increasing the tax increases the burden on the people, especially young people, so it is a way to avoid it. I think that you should consider how to use tax more than that. For example, taxes are used for salaries and campaign funds for parliamentarians and government officials, but if the number of legislators and small political parties are reduced, the budget for personnel expenses and election expenses corresponding to that can be enough to enrich other projects. Therefore I think that instead of increasing taxes easily, we should think about how to use the tax. From: http://scroo.weebly.com/
0 コメント
Nowadays, Inflow of population from rural to urban areas has become a big problem. For example, The population of Kanto region, Kansai region Tokai region, and the others including the major cities (Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya, Fukuoka, Sendai etc.) is increasing year by year. Symmetrically, the population of rural is decreasing. There are many reasons for inflowing of population from rural to urban areas. The first reason is different of traffic network. For example, in the major city like Tokyo and Osaka we can go anywhere by the public transport. Moreover, traffic timetable is very dense. If we want to take a train or a bus, we don’t need a waiting time for the traffic. In contrast, in the countryside traffic network is worse than urban. If we want to take a bus or a train, we need a long waiting time for example over one hour. So someone who lives in countryside needs a car for going to a supermarket or a hospital. For that reason, old people who can’t drive a car are not able to go shopping or go to the hospital.
|